After the first
lecture I really found myself thinking a lot about what literacy means in
education as well as how the definition has changed over the years. As we
discussed in lecture, literacy is more than decoding words on a page, it is
also about creating social meanings that vary across contexts. This point
really stuck with me because it made me think about previous misconceptions I’ve
had about what literacy can be. As long as I can remember literacy has meant having
the ability to read and write. I would read the books my teachers told me to
read, I’d write essays on topics I was told was important, and I even dedicated
long periods of time to learning proper grammar and spelling. So while all these
skills are important, sometimes I felt like I didn’t take away information that
I felt was important to my life. After thinking about the ideas of critical
literacy, environmental literacy, financial literacy, and many other types of 21st
century literacies I realized that my definition of literacy was outdated.
Literacy in my eyes was a skill that everyone needed to learn to be successful
in school and the greater world, but literacy is also knowledge, and knowledge
is power. The knowledge that 21st century literacies create allow
for people to think about the world in deep critical ways and help form
possible solutions for problems that influence our world today.

Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/a/mail.csuchico.edu/21st-century-literacy/
21st
century literacies also allow for the development of 21st century skills
such as critical thinking and innovation which are needed to be successful in
the modern world. I believe the school systems in North America tend to
function on an assembly line mentality where all children are taught skills
such as memorization or repetition so they can spit out answers on a test but
don’t learn any valuable life skills. Children are falling through the cracks
because repetition and memorization are not skills that allow for good learning
and growth experiences in the school system, setting them up for failure when
they leave school. I think the most difficult part about this new definition of
21st century literacy skills is that sometimes it feels like trying
to fit a round peg into a square hole. As said before, the school system has a
big focus on standardized testing and scores that determine whether children
are learning well or not. Unfortunately topics such as critical literacy and
environmental literacy are not so easily assessed under standardized testing. I
wonder how can 21st century skills be implemented into a 19th
century school system? How can teachers change their practices to fit in new
ideas? And what does that mean for student teachers like myself? I have been
learning more and more about 21st century skills and I wonder how
the new generation of teachers can change the fabric of the education system?
Regardless, I’m excited to see where this new literacy definition takes me :)